Israeli ministry recruits queers and "diverse" flight attendants as pitchmen

0 comments
Israel has stepped up its campaign to innoculate American liberals against critiques of its apartheid laws. The effort centers on queers and other minorities (just as New York's Jewish Community Relations Council specifically recruits NY City Councilmembers and other leaders from communities of color for its carefully-scripted junkets to Israel.)

Although the campaign is reportedly sending "ambassadors" to in response to invitations to speak, it looks like the ambassadors are being packaged as a tool for Israel lobby groups in places where anti-apartheid groups are having an impact. The flight attendants' first stop: Rutgers University.

In new pinkwashing recruitment campaign, Israel offers free travel for propaganda services
(Electronic Intifada)
"The story of the floundering “Brand Israel” advertising campaign continues. An Israeli government ministry... [is] asking for volunteer “candidates eligible to conduct public diplomacy activities abroad”. The volunteers “will not be eligible for any remuneration” apart from “costs of travel, daily expenses and insurance”...The ministry’s advert says it is looking particularly for “minority members” and “representatives of the gay community” to argue Israel’s case abroad."

In their off hours, El Al flight crews are now ‘ambassadors’
(Jewish Telegraphic Agency)
"...an initiative [puts] El Al crews to use during their U.S. layover time to create a positive image of Israel in the United States. The idea is to counteract the negative images of Israel in the news with the personal stories and faces of El Al pilots and flight attendants... [T]he El Al delegation was unusually diverse: two gay men, a Druze Israeli, a woman who sidelines as an aerobics instructor and a pilot who also is a yoga teacher. The six also happened to be particularly attractive... The Monday talk largely kept clear of the Israeli-Arab conflict..."
Read more »

Queer voices are being co-opted for racist, anti-gay attacks. Where are our advocates?

0 comments
Going forward, QAIA's blog will include opinion posts like this one from individual activists, marked with an "Opinion" tag. These are not QAIA statements.

This is an op-ed written in July 2011, just after QAIA and other anti-apartheid queers had populated Pride marches across New York City. It was never published. Gay City News seemed fatigued of constantly covering the issue, but hadn't (and still hasn't) covered the intense implications of queer institutions' complete failure to respond to a racially- and politically-loaded community uproar. This piece ranged too far for GCN. Mainstream outlets weren't covering the issue at all.

Now that QAIA's blog is up and we can publish ourselves, the same issues seem (unfortunately) just as relevant as they did then. Big queer organizations have not stepped up to insist on queers' right to organize and be safe within our own community. The Israeli government's cynical pinkwashing of persists, and queers who object are still branded "controversial." Right wing hatemongering against Arabs and Muslims is still masked by hatemongers in leftist clothing, who claim to be supporting apartheid on behalf of us poor downtrodden queers. And those of us who object too loudly are still threatened with exclusion and retribution -- not just by Israel boosters, but by our own queer institutions acting on the instructions of straight, politically powerful actors.

We have a lot of work to do.

---------------------------
Queer voices are being co-opted for racist, anti-gay attacks. Where are our advocates?
Emmaia Gelman and Imani Henry - July 3, 2011

The LGBT Center's ban on support for Palestinian LGBT groups was shocking, but it pales in light of the assault now extending far beyond the Center's turf. Outside forces – not queer – are increasingly pressing the queer community to isolate Arab queers and amp up anti-Arab racism. Dirty tricks are escalating: like a massively jacked-up version of “DamascusGayGirl”, the Israeli government was just busted for posing as a queer vlogger. Like fake Arab lesbian blogger Tom McMaster, the Israeli video stole a queer voice to gain credibility – in this case, to claim that opponents of Israel's human rights violations are secretly anti-gay.

The Center has crumbled under these tactics. But will other LGBT institutions stay quiet?

The assault started when shiny millionaire porn producer Michael Lucas heard that the group Siegebusters was meeting at the Center to support the US Boat to Gaza. Lucas, an Israel supporter and anti-Arab pontificator, reportedly organized conservative donors to stop giving if the Center didn't eject Siegebusters. The Center complied, over objections from the Audre Lorde Project, Queers for Economic Justice, Jews Against the Occupation, Sylvia Rivera Law Project, FIERCE, SALGA, GAPIMNY, and Palestinian queer groups Aswat, Al-Qaws and Palestinian Queers for BDS. As Lucas said at the Center's subsequent forum: “why shouldn't the people who give the money tell the Center what to do?”

But the controversy soon jumped from the queer community to the hetero world of US-Israel politics. The NY Jewish Community Relations Council and Jewish Council on Public Affairs were apparently activated by Stuart Appelbaum, gay politically-wired front man of a NYC union, and labor's representative to major Jewish organizations. The lobby groups reportedly asked to meet with the Center on the issue. Appelbaum also contacted elected officials to ensure they would call the Center to support the ban. The Center didn't meet them, and its official position is that it got no such calls from electeds. But the groups Appelbaum mobilized are powerful in New York City politics. When they're up in arms about Israel, electeds think twice before declining requests to support their position. Their demands for a meeting were certainly enough to send a message to the Center.

Meanwhile, the Jerusalem Post reported that the Wiesenthal Center, a Holocaust memorial organization criticized for Muslim-baiting, called queers who support Palestinian queers' demands for human rights “self-hating gays” who '...should be shunned by all LGBT NGOs. By accepting them, the New York center is providing a fig leaf for Arab homophobia.' The JPost article was written by Benjamin Weinthal, a contributor to Gay City News who opposes queer critics of Israel.

Neither the New York lobby groups nor the Wiesenthal Center are remotely gay. But following their efforts, the Center cancelled more meetings and officially banned any on the “Israeli-Palestinian issue.” Since only Palestine human rights groups had scheduled meetings, the ban shut out only those queers whom the JCRC, JCPA and Wiesenthal Center disliked. The Center's unimpressive ambitions were to “avoid controversy” and “not take a position.” But outside lobbying pushed the Center into new waves of controversy, and committed the Center to enforcing anti-Arab racism in the queer community.

It's not new that conservative, anti-Arab straight voices are speaking for queers. For five years, Israel's “Brand Israel” campaign has lobbied queers to view Israel as a gay haven, and the antidote to Islam. That's why the Israeli consulate suddenly marches in Pride, and the Israeli Foreign Ministry markets gay trips to Israel, and last February the JCRC flew queer NY City Councilmembers to Tel Aviv's gay community center. It's straight people – a government with a human rights problem – pretending to speak on behalf of queers, to queers.

Real Israeli and Palestinian queers call Israel's gay spin “pinkwashing.” Palestinian queers have rejected the idea that Israel makes them safe, when Palestinians are constantly denied rights and safety under Israel's military occupation. They note that occupation is the main force behind Palestinian conservatism: Palestinian society, when free, is historically liberal. Inside Israel, gay couples in which at least one partner is non-Jewish (or worse, Arab) face huge obstacles to Israel's much-touted residency and adoption rights. Homophobic violence, compounded by racism against Arab queers, is as persistent as anywhere else.

Pinkwashing may be too old hat to properly scandalize us. But the escalation over Pride weekend was stunning.

First, a NYC Pride contingent was attacked by a gang of Israelis. The marchers had signs reading "Stop Pinkwashing Israeli Apartheid" and "Stonewall Means Fight Back – from Wisconsin to NYC to Palestine." Most were queers of color and women, including many Jewish women. Reportedly, men wearing Israeli pride contingent shirts “rushed into [our] midst... yelling, pushing, thrusting themselves and their signs in front of us... body-checking and pushing our folks.” They knocked a 68-year old marcher to the ground with a metal pole. The attackers were finally pulled out by horrified onlookers from the Armenian contingent.

Next, a weird YouTube video emerged, purportedly by a gay activist who had tried to join the flotilla to Gaza – the same flotilla that Siegebusters was working on. The video claimed organizers rejected the man because they were cozying up to Hamas, therefore a queer passenger would be a problem. Since there are indeed many queers on board the ships, the video raised eyebrows. It turned out to be fake, made by an Israeli PR firm and distributed by two Israeli government workers.

A fake. The Israeli government is impersonating us.

The only thing more shocking would be the continued silence of Big Gay organizations in response to these racially charged assaults on queer identity, voices and bodies. The Center has already committed to silence. In a press release, it explained that it's too hard to let in queers who face opposition; the Center opts just to censor queer human rights work so it can get back to providing support groups. (Frankly, board president Mario Palumbo should resign since he clearly isn't up to the task.)

But we're still waiting to hear from NYC Gay and Lesbian Anti-Violence Project, which hasn't yet responded to the charge of queers of color that the Center is no longer safe space for them. AVP is even more urgently missed since queers challenging Israeli policy are now being physically attacked. We're waiting for GLAAD to object to queer images coopted to thwart human rights efforts.We're waiting for Lambda Legal to stand up for queers' right to organize ourselves, although Lambda lists Lucas and his boyfriend (formerly president of the Center's board) as fundraising “sponsors.”

We won't be silent while we wait. Queers Against Israeli Apartheid will hold another meeting on July 5th at the Center. Yes, we're banned. It'll have to be a sit-in, again.

----
Emmaia Gelman and Imani Henry are members of Queers Against Israeli Apartheid.
Read more »

New threats and silencing from the LGBT Center

0 comments
Below is a reportback from December 1st at the Center, when QAIA was invited to speak briefly at the screening of the Starlite film (which looks really great, by the way.)

The upshot is that the Center is still actively silencing and coercing queers who try to use Center space to discuss queer stuff that the Center finds "controversial." The Center is also still apparently content to silence communities of color without concern for the particularly disturbing implications of that. And the ban on queer discussion of Palestine apparently now extends even to the mention of a ban.

Action planned, please stay tuned. As queers occupy HRC to challenge the corporate/right-wing takeover of queer communities, it's time to build a bigger challenge to the Center as an emblem of the exact same issues. The interconnections between anti-Arab/anti-Muslim hatemongering in the name of queers and moneyed gays' effort to gentrify the queer community get clearer every time QAIA shows up at the Center.

-------
Reportback (from Emmaia):

QAIA was invited to speak briefly at the screening of the Starlite Lounge film at the Center, because the filmmakers didn't want to hold an event at the Center without acknowledging the ban.

The plan was to put QAIA flyers on chairs, and then at the end of the night make a quick announcement/update. We also had little cards that people could sign and leave at the reception desk for the Center's board president Mario Palumbo and executive director Glennda Testone to object to the ban.

As we started to put the flyers on chairs, a Center staff person literally panicked. He ran in repeating "There's a moratorium!  There's a moratorium! You can't do that here!" and snatched up the flyers already distributed. He told me that he was "happy to have me there" (in my own community space!) but not to flyer. He told the filmmakers "I don't know, this is all from before I even came to the Center!" -- in other words, he had no idea what was going on, but was committed to his job as an enforcement-bot. After that, Robert Woodworth came to the room and stayed till the end.

The filmmakers and I talked about how to proceed without taking the focus away from from Starlite, and from the members of the Starlite community who were there to speak out. We settled on having the filmmakers just hold up a flyer at the end of the screening, announce that they'd invited QAIA because of the ban, and people would hear an update from QAIA at the end of the panel discussion.

I'm not sure what conversation took place between them and Center staff, but they came back to say they couldn't make the announcement after all, because Center staff had said they'd be kicked out. They were angry about being silenced, but they didn't want to risk derailing the message about Starlite. They were also worried that Starlite folks would not be allowed back at the Center to continue to raise awareness, funds, etc. The Center had successfully leveraged its control of community space to shut people up. Insert your own analysis of strong-arming an initiative of queers of color in particular.

Instead, at the end of the night, the organizers called on me as an audience member. I thanked them for questioning whether to hold their event at the Center. I said that the Center was community space that had been created, like Starlite, by queers who were carving out their own space when nothing else existed; that it had since become a big-money organization that's lost to the queer community that founded it and is now banning "controversial" queers; that from one community struggling to hold onto valuable space to another, we appreciated that the organizers had tried to include QAIA; and that the Center had stopped us from telling them about the issue.

People in the room got it, and virtually everyone came by on their way out to take a flyer.
Read more »
 

Copyright © 2010 • NYC Queers Against Israeli Apartheid! • Design by Dzignine